BTL 855 - Paradox of Thrift

 

The Banking Tutor’s Lessons

BTL 855                                                                                                30-12-2025

Paradox of Thrift

The idea that an increase in an individual’s savings rate might unexpectedly lead to a decline rather than an increase in total savings in an economy is known as the “paradox of savings,” or “paradox of thrift.”

This contradicts the widely held notion that an increase in personal savings rates will lead to an increase in the total amount of savings within the economy. Therefore, it’s thought that while savings could benefit a household, the overall economy might not benefit from them.

When an individual decides to save more and spend less, they accumulate more personal wealth. This is generally seen as a prudent and beneficial action for the individual. However, if all individuals in an economy increase their savings at the same time, overall consumption decreases. Since consumer spending is a major component of aggregate demand (total demand for goods and services within an economy), a decrease in consumption leads to a reduction in aggregate demand.

Lower aggregate demand results in reduced production because businesses face lower demand for their products. This can lead to layoffs, higher unemployment, and a decrease in income levels across the economy.

Paradoxically, while individuals are trying to save more, the resultant decrease in income and economic activity can lead to lower overall savings in the economy. This happens because reduced income levels mean people have less money to save, even if they want to save more. 

Examples and Implications

Great Depression: During the Great Depression, many individuals and businesses increased their savings due to economic uncertainty. However, this collective increase in savings led to a severe drop in aggregate demand, exacerbating the economic downturn.

Lack of social security: With limited social safety nets, individuals save to secure their future against uncertainties such as health issues, education costs, and old age.

Demonetization (2016): The sudden withdrawal of high-value currency notes led to a temporary increase in household savings as people were uncertain about future liquidity. This led to a slowdown in consumer spending and adversely impacted economic growth in the short term.

COVID-19 Pandemic: During the pandemic, the economic uncertainty led to higher savings rates as households cut back on discretionary spending. This further reduced aggregate demand, slowing down economic recovery. The government responded with stimulus packages, direct cash transfers, and increased spending to boost demand.

While saving is important for individual financial security, excessive saving on a large scale can lead to decreased economic activity, higher unemployment, and lower overall savings in the economy.

Sekhar Pariti

+91 9440641014